
OSCEOLA BROWNFIELD REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
231-832-7397
Fax 231-832-3381
1. Call to Order
A meeting of the Osceola County Brownfield Redevelopment
Authority Board (Board) took place at the
a. Gary Bailey, Board Member
b. Jim Belcher, Board Member
c. Dave Bisbee, Board Member
d. Jill Halladay, Board Member
e. Stephanie Horn; Environmental Consultant, AKT Peerless Environmental Services
f. Rich Jacobs, Board Member
g. Dan Massy; MSU Extension, Board Director and Recording Secretary
h. Lori Mitchell, Board Member
i. Shannon Schmidt, Board Member
The following materials were provided to Board Members prior to, or at the meeting:
a. Meeting Agenda (prior to and available at meeting)
b. April 28, 2010 Meeting Minutes (prior to and available at meeting)
c. Environmental Site Assessment Status Chart (provided at meeting)
d. Recognized Environmental Conditions section from the Phase I Environmental Assessment for C & N Supply (pg. 19), 101/103 E. Church St. (pg. 20), and 135 E. Bittner Ave. (pg. 25-27) (provided at meeting)
e. Financial Status Report & Measures of Success from EPA Quarterly Report #9 for both the Hazardous Substance and Petroleum Substance grants (provided at meeting)
2. Approval of the Agenda:
(10-26)
A motion was made by Dave Bisbee, supported by Rich
Jacobs, to approve the agenda as
presented. Motion carried
unanimously.
3. Public Comments: There were no members of the public present.
4. Approval of the Minutes of April 28, 2010
(10-27) A motion was made by Dave Bisbee, supported by Gary Bailey, to approve the minutes from April 28, 2010 as written. Motion carried unanimously.
5. Unfinished Business & Reports
a. Financial Reports
(1) Follow-up Conversation with Alan Baumann; EPA, Region 5: Dan stated that right after our last board meeting he received an email from Alan Baumann telling us the EPA would not be pulling our Hazardous Assessment grant at this time.
(2) EPA Quarterly Report #9, Budget Schedule: Board members reviewed the Budget Schedule from EPA Quarterly Report #9 for both the Hazardous Substance Assessment and Petroleum Assessment grants. There was discussion concerning the lack of expenditures as compared to the proposed timeline; however, the Board felt this would somewhat correct itself with the number of projects that are in progress. Quarterly Report #9 is on file.
(3) Bills in Excess of $250: Five bills in excess of $250 were presented.
(10-28) A
motion was made by Gary Bailey, supported by Lori Mitchell, to approve payment
of $2,200 to
AKT Peerless for “Professional services
rendered and project costs
incurred to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment at 101-103 East Church Street, Tustin,
Michigan.” Motion carried
unanimously.
(10-29) A
motion was made by Gary Bailey, supported by Dave Bisbee, to approve payment of $2,100 to AKT
Peerless for “Professional services
rendered and project costs incurred to
conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment at 135 East Bittner Avenue, Reed City, Michigan.” Motion carried unanimously.
(10-30) A
motion was made by Gary Bailey, supported by Dave Bisbee, to approve payment of $2,200 to AKT
Peerless for “Professional services rendered
and project costs incurred to conduct a
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment at
(10-31) A motion was made by Dave Bisbee,
supported by Gary Bailey, to approve payment
of $2,200 to
AKT Peerless for “Professional services
rendered and project costs incurred to
conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment with limited hazardous materials sampling at
(10-32) A
motion was made by Gary Bailey, supported by Lori Mitchell, to approve payment of $4,807.50 to AKT
Peerless for “Professional services
rendered and project costs
incurred to conduct a Phase II Site Investigation at
b. Measures of Success
The EPA has a section in the Quarterly Report titled Measures of Success. Dan reviewed and the Board discussed the indicators which are tracked in this section.
c. Site Assessments in Progress
The Environmental Site Assessment Status Chart was used to review the status of all approved projects. The Environmental Site Assessment Status Chart is attached.
(1) The Phase I report for
(2) The Phase I report for 135 E. Bittner was received. A Phase II is required. .
(10-33) A motion was made by Dave Bisbee, supported by Gary Bailey, to conduct a Phase II at 135 E. Bittner. Motion carried unanimously.
(3) The Phase I report for 22826 US-10 was received. A Phase II is not required.
(4) The Phase I report for 101 &
(10-34) A motion was made by Dave Bisbee, supported
by Shannon Schmidt, to conduct a Phase II at 101 &
6. New Business & Communications
a.
Potential Sites
The Environmental Site Assessment
Status Chart was used to review potential new projects. The Environmental Site Assessment Status Chart
is attached.
(1)
Vacant
(10-35)
A motion was
made by Rich Jacobs, supported by Gary Bailey, to conduct a Phase I at the
lot of the former Hersey General Store. Motion carried unanimously.
(2)
(10-36) A motion was made by Dave Bisbee, supported
by Gary Bailey, to update the previous
Phase I conducted at the vacant
(3)
(10-37) A
motion was made by Dave Bisbee, supported by Gary Bailey, to conduct a Phase I at
b. Other:
None
7. Additional Public Comments: None
8. Adjournment
(10-38) A motion was made by Rich Jacobs, supported by Gary Bailey,
to adjourn at 11:50 a.m. Motion carried unanimously.
The next meeting of the Osceola County
Brownfield Redevelopment Authority is June 16, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. in the
__________________________ ____________
Dan Massy, Director Date
Recording Secretary